• Decision Lab
  • Posts
  • 7 Painful Truths I Learned When Our $25M Exit Talks Imploded đź’Ł

7 Painful Truths I Learned When Our $25M Exit Talks Imploded đź’Ł

Why you need to be "Exit Optimized" from day 1.

Here's the thing about failed acquisitions - they're like those embarrassing high school photos you hope never surface on social media. But unlike those photos, these lessons are actually worth sharing.

Let me take you back to 2019. We were riding high on strong growth, solid profits, and what we believed was a bulletproof business model. Then came the acquisition offer. It was exhilarating. After all, what entrepreneur doesn’t dream of a big exit? We had always envisioned selling when our passion for the business started to wane. While this opportunity arrived earlier than expected, we were still thrilled, flattered, and—if we're being honest—completely swept up in the allure. Coming from modest backgrounds, the prospect of life-changing money was intoxicating. So we jumped in, unaware of the hard-earned lessons that awaited us. 

Nothing went right after signing the LOI (Letter of Intent). 

Why? Because we weren’t truly "exit optimized." I know, I know—it sounds like another buzzword thrown around in boardrooms. But hear me out: this oversight cost us millions, and chances are, it could be costing you too.

The Profit Paradox

First things first—being profitable wasn't enough. Sure, we were making money, but not in a "wow, those margins are incredible" kind of way. When your profits are just okay, buyers sense weakness. They don’t offer premiums; they demand them. The reason is simple: the more profitable you are, the more leverage you have. Buyers know that if you’re highly profitable, you can afford to be selective. But when profitability is merely decent, you're negotiating from a position of weakness—it’s like showing up to a sword fight with a butter knife and expecting to win.

The Scale Equation Nobody Talks About

You know what buyers really want to know? Exactly how many resources—both people and dollars—it takes to generate another million in revenue. We had rough estimates, but buyers demanded airtight proof. We built detailed spreadsheets, yet they wanted historical validation, not just projections. The lesson? If you can't back up your scaling costs with concrete data, you're already ceding negotiation power. The best way to validate? Meticulously track the costs and efficiency of your last million-dollar growth phase.

The "Key Person" Time Bomb

Remember that scene in Iron Man where Tony Stark says "I am Iron Man"? Cool in movies, terrible for acquisitions. Our business relied too heavily on key individuals. Buyers saw this as a risk, not a feature. They weren't wrong.

The Services Trap

This is where things got messy (and by messy, I mean painfully complicated). Our technology included a service model designed to boost usage and engagement. The issue? It operated like an all-you-can-eat buffet—except some clients were showing up with industrial-sized containers. This made it difficult to quantify, nearly impossible to control, and even harder to assign a definitive value. Buyers immediately flagged this as a red flag. And trust me, they didn’t just notice—they scrutinized every detail.

The Retention Reality Check

We believed our retention metrics were strong—and they were. The issue, however, was that the methods we relied on to maintain retention didn’t appear scalable. Buyers scrutinized our retention strategy, questioning whether it could sustain growth without excessive manual effort. This was yet another crucial detail we overlooked when we first considered an exit.

The Psychology of Sunk Costs

The real gut punch? The longer we stayed in talks, the harder it became to walk away. It was like watching your poker chips disappear but refusing to fold because "you've already invested too much." Our valuation kept slipping, yet we kept negotiating, clinging to the hope that things would turn around. This is a textbook example of the sunk cost fallacy, a cognitive bias in behavioral economics studied extensively by Richard Thaler and Daniel Kahneman. It’s the irrational tendency to persist in an endeavor simply because of past investments—ignoring the reality that cutting losses would have been the smarter move. And we fell for it, hook, line, and sinker

The Exit Optimization Wake-Up Call

Being exit-ready isn't about having a pretty pitch deck or impressive logos on your client list. It's about building a business model that's designed to be acquired from day one. We were pushing water uphill, trying to retrofit our business into what buyers wanted, instead of building it that way from the start.

You Got It GIF by FX Networks

Gif by fxnetworks on Giphy

The Silver Lining (Because There Has to Be One, Right?)

This expensive lesson taught us something priceless: Exit optimization isn’t a last-minute fix—it’s a foundational strategy. It’s about creating systems, documentation, and scalable processes that make your business inherently valuable to buyers, even when you’re not actively selling. Fortunately, we learned from our missteps, refined our approach, and three years later, we exited on our terms—at a significantly higher valuation, with multiple offers in hand and complete control over the process. 

Want to know if you're actually exit-ready? Here are three questions to ask yourself:

  1. Can you show exactly how much it costs (in time, money, and resources) to acquire and service each $100K in new revenue?

  2. Is your business model documented so clearly that a stranger could understand and replicate it?

  3. Could your top three employees leave tomorrow and your business still run smoothly?

If you answered "no" to any of these, you've got some work to do. 

Keep Reading

Reply

or to participate.